Ordellum AI Native SDKIn development
Security verification
Vulnerabilities are found, fixed and re-tested before code ever reaches a network.
Each technique catches what the others miss. Select one to see how it works.
Static analysis
Examines the code without running it: syntax trees, control flow, data flow and taint tracking reveal unsafe paths.
- Reentrancy
- Repeated calls that drain funds before state is updated.
- Arithmetic overflow
- Numbers that wrap around their limits.
- Access control
- Functions callable by the wrong people, and unauthorised withdrawals.
- Denial of service
- Ways to block a contract from working.
- Timing and ordering
- Timestamp dependence and front-running.
- Market attacks
- Oracle manipulation and flash-loan exploits.
Step 1: Detect
A vulnerability is identified and explained.
Step 2: Propose
The remediation engine generates alternative fixes.
Step 3: Verify
Tests confirm that the fix works and nothing else broke.
Security review is treated as detection and repair together — not just a list of findings handed back to the developer.
Standard security checks are part of every paid plan. Heavier analysis is measured separately as an advanced review.
- Deep fuzzing
- Long-running, high-volume input exploration.
- Symbolic execution
- Systematic exploration of execution paths.
- Multi-agent assessment
- Several security agents reviewing independently.
- Economic attacks
- Scenario analysis of incentive and market exploits.
- Privilege and upgrades
- Access-control, upgrade and storage-layout verification.
- Interactions and gas
- Cross-contract interaction, gas and denial-of-service analysis, plus re-testing of findings.
Contracts in production are watched continuously: on-chain events, pending transactions, oracle feeds and state changes are monitored in real time to spot unusual patterns. The monitoring design includes defensive responses such as temporarily pausing a contract for critical threats or rate-limiting under high threat.